Cases 11 - 20 of 22
TRICE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00527
Respondent:
SEC. WETZEL, SUPT. CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
CEASAR TRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TRICE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00439
Respondent:
SUPT. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, SGT WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
CEASAR TRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIBSON v. SUPER. M. ADAMS, et al.
as 2:2020cv01419
Defendant:
PA DOC, MERCER SCI STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY SUPER ADAMS, SUPER. M. ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Luther et al
as 1:2020cv01621
Defendant:
Sec. Wetzel, Perrigo(R) Manufacturer, Clay Pharmaceutical and others
Plaintiff:
Lavon Cecil Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICTOR v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant:
COUNSELOR HOPKINS, LT. WALKER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MONTERO v. DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2016cv00857
Petitioner:
MANUEL REYO PENA GARCI MONTERO
Respondent:
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and SEC OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Montero v. Dept Of Homeland Security/Sec Of State
as 1:2016cv00752
Petitioner:
MANUEL RAUL REYES-PENA
Respondent:
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/SEC OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PENA v. SEC HOMELAND SECRUTIY et al
as 2:2016cv01882
Petitioner:
MANUEL RAUL REYES PENA
Respondent:
SEC HOMELAND SECRUTIY, SEC DEPT OF STATE and US GEN ATTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MONTERO v. DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/SEC OF STATE
as 2:2016cv00408
Petitioner:
MANUEL RAUL REYO PENA MONTERO
Respondent:
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/SEC OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MONTERO v. DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/SEC OF STATE
as 2:2015cv05821
Petitioner:
MANUEL RAUL REYO PENA GARCIA MONTERO
Respondent:
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/SEC OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
