Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Smart v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2019cv01783
Petitioner:
Fabian D. Smart
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04580
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04521
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, SMART COMMUNICATIONS, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. HINES, III.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv03455
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, C.E.R.T. TEAM, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv05109
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL and SMART COMMUNICATIONS
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
Anthony Edward Oliver
Defendant:
John Wetzel, James Eckard, Eric Tice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TUCKER-SMART v. BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER-SMART
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BEN SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, GANSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hough v. Samuels et al
as 3:2012cv01705
Petitioner:
Johnathan Hough
Respondent:
Charles Samuels and Timothy Smart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
