Cases 11 - 20 of 25
GAYLES v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE GAYLES
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, JO LYTTLE, BECCA REMILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snider v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00149
Petitioner:
Bill Snider
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNIDER v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00094
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. SNIDER
as 1:2014cv00725
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant:
SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. MORRISON et al
as 1:2014cv00655
Defendant:
C. MORRISON, BEN SANDMAN and MR. SNIDER
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PURVIS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2014cv00041
Defendant:
ARNOLD, BARNETT, BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
WILLARD PURVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISBY-ISRAEL v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2012cv00116
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Plaintiff:
AARON ISBY-ISRAEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISBY-ISRAEL v. LEMMONS
as 1:2011cv01681
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY HUSPON, AARON ISBY-ISRAEL and TONY MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNIDER v. SUPERINTENDENT, WVCF
as 2:2011cv00168
Petitioner:
BILL R. SNIDER
Respondent:
ST. JOSEPH CO. SUPERIOR COURT and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
