Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Sanchez v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2015cv01153
Plaintiff:
Artemio Marin Sanchez
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
Delfino Gonzalez Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John T Rathman and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2012cv00616
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Irene Colin Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2012cv00553
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ericka Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2011cv00940
Plaintiff:
Cenobio M. Sanchez
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Barnett et al
as 4:2010cv00942
Petitioner:
Paciano Amador Sanchez
Respondent:
Rodney Barnett, Leigh Wilkins, Kevin Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez-Morena v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv08011
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Sanchez-Morena
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2010cv00020
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Irene Colin Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lua v. Etowah County Detention Center Medical Staff
as 4:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Hector Sanchez Lua
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
