Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Phipps v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06603
Plaintiff:
Danny Phipps
Defendant:
City of New York, The State of New York, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Ernest King
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Monica Windley, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campanello v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv07432
Plaintiff:
Justin Campanello
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Monica Windley, Renae and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2015cv01357
Plaintiff:
William Bagley
Defendant:
The State of New York, George Pataki, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv08691
Plaintiff:
William Bagley
Defendant:
The State of New York, George Pataki, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michaels v. Evans et al
as 1:2010cv03935
Plaintiff:
Jay Seth Michaels
Defendant:
Andrea W. Evans, New York State Parole Officer John Doe #1, New York State Parole Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuckey v. Sheehan et al
as 1:2010cv00904
Plaintiff:
Eric Tuckey
Defendant:
Larry Sheehan, Jaquin Alemany, John Mangialardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritchie v. Rock et al
as 9:2008cv01245
Plaintiff:
Seth Ritchie
Defendant:
David Rock, Philip Heath, Holdridge and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Correctional Officer John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2008cv03206
Plaintiff:
Seth Mikhail Brown
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe #1, Correctional Officer John Doe #2, Correctional Officer John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ritchie v. Hulihan et al
as 9:2008cv00706
Plaintiff:
Seth Ritchie
Defendant:
William Hulihan, Karen Phillips, David Wiernickie and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
