Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Davison v. Carter
as 2:2008cv00151
Petitioner: Kevin Jermaine Davison
Defendant: Steve Carter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Wright, Sr. v. Steve Carter
as 08-2162
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL D. WRIGHT, SR.
Respondent - Appellee: STEVE CARTER, Indiana Attorney General, in his official capacity
Vincent Rivera v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 08-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant: VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee: MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, TIM BERRY, Treasurer and others
WHATLEY v. SUPERINTENDANT WENDY KNIGHT et al
as 1:2008cv00541
Plaintiff: KENNETH L. WHATLEY, SR.
Defendant: SUPERINTENDANT WENDY KNIGHT, OFFICER SANDERS and ATT. GEN. STEVE CARTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCOY v. CONWAY et al
as 1:2008cv00500
Petitioner: ERVIN L. MCCOY
Respondent: JEFF CONWAY, FRANK ANDERSON and STEVE CARTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WHATLEY v. PLAINFIELD CORR. FACILITY et al
as 1:2008cv00429
Plaintiff: KENNETH L. WHATLEY, SR.
Defendant: PLAINFIELD CORR. FACILITY, WENDY KNIGHT and STEVE CARTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CUPPETT v. CONWAY et al
as 1:2008cv00311
Petitioner: GREGORY-WILLIAM: CUPPETT
Respondent: JEFF CONWAY, FRANK ANDERSON and STEVE CARTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STOCKS v. CARTER
as 1:2008cv00148
Petitioner: GARY STOCKS
Respondent: STEVE CARTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROLLINGCLOUD v. HANLON et al
as 1:2007cv01411
Petitioner: KENNETH ROLLINGCLOUD
Respondent: TOM HANLON, IDOC PAROLE DIVISION, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARKS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00805
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY PARKS
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, MITCH E. DANIELS, JR., STEVE CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?