Cases 11 - 20 of 337
Shawn Spottswood v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1520
Petitioner:
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and Washington County, 10th Judicial District
Garwood v. Minnesota State Patrol et al
as 0:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Rick Lee Garwood
Defendant:
Minnesota State Patrol, Nick Otterson, Morrison County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miyo Alexander v. State of Minnesota
as 24-1145
Petitioner:
Miyo M. Alexander
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Steenhard v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv03844
Petitioner:
James Dean Steenhard
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steenhard v. State of Minnesota
as 4:2023cv00510
Petitioner:
James Dean Steenhard
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forest v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv03716
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Forest
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv03673
Plaintiff:
Edward Wilson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota and Ramsey County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seamon v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Leonard Deron Seamon
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Hennepin County District Court, Judge Marta Chou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 23-3003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
