Cases 11 - 20 of 463
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03998
Petitioner:
Tony Henry Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browning v. USA
as 3:2023cv01882
Petitioner:
Tony Demon Browning
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03118
Petitioner:
Tony H Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Solomon v. LNU
as 3:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Tony Undra Solomon, Sr.
Defendant:
Evelyn LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington et al v. Beaumont Bone and Joint et al
as 1:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr., Michael J Wheeler and Richard Edwards
Defendant:
Beaumont Bone and Joint and Head Bone Specialist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rangel v. WellPath, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Leonora Rangel, Individually, and On behalf of The Estate of Tony Martinez and Leonora Rangel
Defendant:
WellPath, LLC, Gemma Volpato, Kimm Hastey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Tony Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00298
Defendant:
Chris Tinsley, Derick Choice, Nancy Perryman and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
