Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bruner et al v. Isaac et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
William Sperfslage, Mike Heinricy, Tracy Dietsch and others
Plaintiff:
Davante Green and Benjamin Lee Bruner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruner v. Isaac et al
as 4:2019cv00073
Defendant:
William Spearslage, Mike Heinricy, Tracy Dietsch and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Bruner
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Doss
Defendant:
Tracy Dietsch, Hailey Hatrick, Dave Siler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00273
Defendant:
Paul Nemmers, Hailey Hatrick, Dave Siler and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Doss
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Morrison et al
as 4:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lothaire Reynolds
Defendant:
Judy Morrison, Mike Schierbrock, Jay Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Cutwright v. Sean Crawford, et al
as 14-3125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis Jonathan Cutwright
Defendant - Appellee:
Sean Crawford, Sheryl Dahm, Tracy Dietsch and others
Cutwright v. Crawford et al
as 4:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Louis Jonathan Cutwright
Defendant:
Sean Crawford, Sheryl Dahm, Tracy Dietsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yancey v. Dietsch et al
as 1:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Yancey
Defendant:
Tracy Dietsch and Randy Caspers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Fayram et al
as 1:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Duane Wright
Defendant:
John Fayram, William Spersledge and Tracy Dietsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardisty v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Justin Hardisty
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jerry Burtruff, John Fayram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
