Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Ogle v. Pittman et al (RHC)
as 3:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Chuck Pittman, U.S. Marshal, James Barrons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Pittman et al
as 3:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Chuck Pittman, Marcus Ball, Warn Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. United States et al
as 2:2013cv02588
Petitioner:
Ronnie Jackson
Respondent:
United States, U.S. Marshals, Edward L. Stanton, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 2:2013cv02494
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Davis
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and John Doe U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bernadel v. Stephens et al
as 2:2013cv02410
Plaintiff:
Mario Gerard Bernadel
Defendant:
D.R. Stephens, FCI - Memphis, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 1:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Davis
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and Jeffrey A. Hedden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Williams v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 2:2011cv02895
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pierre Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal, Correction Corporation of America and West Tennessee Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 2:2011cv02086
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Taylor, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Correction Corporation of America and Illaraza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Mills et al
as 2:2009cv02174
Plaintiff:
Rene Cosmas Montgomery
Defendant:
Marcel Mills, Andrew Jones, Gwendolyn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
