Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Michaels v. Charleston County Government et al
as 2:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hennessey Michaels
Defendant:
Charleston County Government, South Carolina Government and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. United States Government of South Carolina
as 6:2021cv03784
Plaintiff:
Antwyn Gibbs
Defendant:
United States Government of South Carolina, US Government and Newberry Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01195
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Chappell v. United States Government et al
as 9:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Modier, CSO Mr. Moore, CSO A. Coles and others
Plaintiff:
William Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geissler v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 4:2016cv02808
Plaintiff:
Russell Geissler
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of and United States Government, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. McKie et al
as 6:2014cv01198
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B McKie, Ms Abbot, Mr Jeffcoat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, K F McDonald, US Postal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03306
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Tuesdale et al
as 6:2012cv02746
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Ms Tuesdale, Mr Ragland, Mr Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
