Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Lebron-Rivera v. The State of Texas et al
as 7:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Midland County, Midland County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vela v. Presley et al
as 2:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Vela
Defendant:
Doctor Presley, United States Marshall Service and The GEO Group Inc. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 5:2021cv00177
Defendant:
Dr. Ghazwan M. Kroma, University Hospital, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Tremont D. Williams
Berry v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv00563
Petitioner:
Duane L Berry
Respondent:
Eric D Wilson and The United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berry et al v. Wilson et al
as 4:2020cv00173
Respondent:
Warden Eric D Wilson and United States Marshal
Petitioner:
Federal Reserve Bank System Accounting TR, Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Duane Letroy Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valentino v. United States Marshal
as 4:2020cv00304
Petitioner:
Joseph R Valentino
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mireles v. United States Marshalls Services
as 1:2020cv00011
Respondent:
Marshall Lara and United States Marshalls Services
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Mireles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thibodeaux v. Kemp et al
as 6:2019cv00381
Defendant:
State Counselor Barbara L Law, Mark Calhoon, Office of Inspector General United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Paul Dewayne Thibodeaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. GEO Joe Corley Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv00327
Respondent:
GEO Joe Corley Detention Center
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Joe Corley Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Nelson Alexander Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agnew v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
