Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Jones #190298 v. Nash et al
as 2:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Woods and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Cruz et al
as 2:2016cv04233
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Maria L Cruz, Roger A Nelson, John N Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv02418
Plaintiff:
Edward Immanuel Young
Defendant:
Unknown Horn, Julie Barnett, Tammy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaden #191578 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02191
Plaintiff:
Charles Welvon Eaden, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, C Lee, A Barrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beardsley v. O'Hearn et al
as 3:2015cv08232
Plaintiff:
Lavonne Beardsley
Defendant:
Unknown O'Hearn, Unknown Ortega, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wood et al
as 2:2015cv01435
Defendant:
Unknown Wood, Unknown Bodway, R Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Markayle Donyeil Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #120870 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lavance Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Musachio and Unknown Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv02113
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated, Arizona, State of, G Bonorand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01991
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated, Arizona, State of, G Bonorand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Ray et al
as 4:2014cv02181
Plaintiff:
Ivan A Owens
Defendant:
Unknown Ray, Unknown Wood and Pima County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
