Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Matlock v. Sevier et al
as 3:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Greg Sheward, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Captain Earhardt and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. Everly et al
as 3:2018cv00590
Defendant:
P Everly, C Samargin and Edward Vasquez
Plaintiff:
Terrance E Lacey, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. SHERMAN et al
as 2:2018cv00139
Defendant:
P. CHATMAN, J. E. KRUEGER, SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. KREUGER
as 2:2017cv00498
Respondent:
J. E. KREUGER
Petitioner:
ADRIAN J. VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VASQUEZ-SILVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00269
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ-SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
VASQUEZ v. U.S. GOV et al
as 2:2016cv00040
Defendant:
EMIGRATION/ I.C.E and U.S. GOV
Miscellaneou:
SERVICE LIST
Plaintiff:
ANEL VASQUEZ-GUTIEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01572
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASQUEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01571
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASQUEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01422
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASQUEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2015cv01265
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
