Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Willie Junior Hines v. Warden Tyger River Corr. Inst.
as 17-6085
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE JUNIOR HINES, a/k/a Willie Hines, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Hines v. Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 6:2016cv03386
Petitioner:
Willie Junior Hines
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strickland v. South Carolina
as 4:2015cv03701
Petitioner:
Perry Keith Strickland
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brian Nesbitt v. Warden Tyger River Correct
as 15-6814
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Roberts v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2015cv01484
Petitioner:
Steven William Roberts
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brian Nesbitt v. Warden Tyger River
as 14-7626
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
James Brown, Jr. v. Warden Tyger River Corr. Inst.
as 14-6837
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BROWN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Middleton v. Roseneau
as 5:2014cv01111
Petitioner:
Antonio Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holloway v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
James Holloway
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Melton v. Warden Tyger River
as 12-6387
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK MELTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.