Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Lightfeather v. Hartman et al
as 8:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Claudis Hartman, Patrick Condon, Christopher Siefert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Lancaster County
as 8:2022cv00350
Petitioner:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Respondent:
Lancaster County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lightfeather v. Officer Mosbeth USMC et al
as 8:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Officer Mosbeth USMC, Officer McShrine, Officer Ryfinkn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Stinson et al
as 8:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Brenda Mae Stinson and Amy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Nelson et al
as 8:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Austin E. Lightfeather
Defendant:
Jodi Nelson, Patrick Condon, Carol Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Kopf
as 8:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Richard G. Kopf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Browning
as 8:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Tina Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00258
Petitioner:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lightfeather v. Officer Ryvinfki
as 8:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Officer Ryvinfki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Webb
as 8:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Yohan Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
