Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Moore v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Corion Leshon Moore
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Keith Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Weaver
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Kenneth Sconyers, Sherry A. Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Hopkins et al
as 4:2013cv02103
Plaintiff:
Secillup Joe Welch
Defendant:
Jamey Hopkins, Carlos Woods and J. Weaver
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Earl et al
as 1:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Christopher Earl, J. Raines, Larry Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Palvakovic et al
as 4:2012cv03958
Plaintiff:
Cedric L Baker
Defendant:
David Palvakovic, Clayton Wheat, Debra Sanders and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggins v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Riggins
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services , Donny Myers , Sylvia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hicks et al
as 2:2012cv02369
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Lloyd Hicks, James Weaver, A Davis and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Price et al
as 2:2012cv02193
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
E Price, Lloyd Hicks, Angela Miree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher-El v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Manson Fisher-El
Defendant:
Mohamma Jenkins, James Weaver and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
