Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Woods v. Mills et al
as 4:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Mills, James Jones, Judy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00049
Petitioner:
Daniel Nathan Wood
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Gerald Chatham, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. DeSoto County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wood
Defendant:
DeSoto County Sheriff's Department, Bill Rasco, Chad Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Wood et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Morrow
Defendant:
April Wood, Trent Kelly and Joe Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Delvalle v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Esteban Delvalle
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Jason Russell, Joseph Dimaria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Depaz-Lopez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jose Depaz-Lopez
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Jason Russell, Joseph Dimaria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2014cv00175
Petitioner:
Authur Woods
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGinnis v. Pugh et al
as 1:2014cv00207
Plaintiff:
Cedrick McGinnis
Defendant:
Jason Pugh, Neal Higgason, Theresa Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Lowndes County et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Petitioner:
Rita Wood
Respondent:
Lowndes County and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaines v. Rankin County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2013cv00486
Plaintiff:
Willie B. Gaines, Jr.
Defendant:
Rankin County Board of Supervisors, Jared Morrison, Wood Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
