Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County City, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tims v. MPD et al
as 2:2022cv02736
Plaintiff:
William D. Tims
Defendant:
MPD, Shelby Co. D.A..'s Office, U.S. Dept of Justice Western District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00812
Petitioner:
Howard Lee Young
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Young v. Phillips et al
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Thunder Young
Defendant:
J Phillips and Sullivan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Hudson
as 3:2022cv00687
Petitioner:
Carlos M. Young
Respondent:
(f/n/u) Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young v. Buress et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thunder Young
Defendant:
Cpl Buress, Officer Mutter, Officer Sanspon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meehan v. Young et al
as 2:2022cv02105
Plaintiff:
Shaun Michael Meehan
Defendant:
S. Young, Multiple Unknown Named SCSO Swat Officers and Multiple Unknown Named ATF Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bouldin et al
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Andrew Young Johnson
Defendant:
David Bouldin, David Patterson, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Atkinson et al
as 2:2022cv02103
Plaintiff:
Donald Edwards
Defendant:
Shae Atkinson, Tiana Young and Erin Barefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
