Cases 11 - 20 of 468
Person v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv05755
Defendant:
Ramona M Jones, Person, Alannah M Athins and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05727
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Combs
Defendant:
Eric B Smith, Corey D Evans and Carter H Whipple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Robnett et al
as 3:2023cv05725
Plaintiff:
Dennis D Corbray and Dennis Derise Corbray
Defendant:
Mary Robnett and Bill Robnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon v. Sherwood et al
as 2:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfonso Leon
Defendant:
Sherwood, D Quinto, Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Townsel v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eric Townsel
Defendant:
Kenneth Sawyer, David Kenney, Sandra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. USA
as 2:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Brian D Knight
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lotusflower v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv05558
Plaintiff:
Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower
Defendant:
Charlotte Headley, Alishia McColl, Boschulte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagos v. Torres-Ramirez et al
as 2:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
D Torres-Ramirez, T Khuu, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v King County Adult Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Dwante Jackson and Dawnte Jackson
Defendant:
King County Adult Corrections, D Echols, Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady-Davis v. Hartman et al
as 2:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Markiena Deshane Brady-Davis and Markiena Deshane Davis
Defendant:
Matthew D. Hartman, Impact Law Group and Justin Sier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
