Cases 201 - 210 of 2,430
Nunez v. Bennett
as 4:2022cv04118
Petitioner:
Michael Nunez
Respondent:
Warden K. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fernandez v. State of South Dakota
as 4:2022cv04141
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mark Fernandez
Defendant:
State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerlach v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04134
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Luke Gerlach
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Joan Adam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chipps v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv05077
Plaintiff:
Austin Lee Chipps, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Richmond v. Sullivan
as 5:2022cv05082
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Richmond
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murdock v. Mattson #573 et al
as 4:2022cv04125
Plaintiff:
Maureo Murdock
Defendant:
Warden Mattson #573, Lt. McGovern #460, Sgt. Aaneson #265 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pounds v. Charles Mix County et al
as 4:2022cv04114
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Pounds
Defendant:
Charles Mix County Jail, Randy Thaler, Erica Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04119
Petitioner:
Maurice Bellafonta Cathey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Peneaux v. Federal Courts
as 5:2022cv05084
Petitioner:
Sherman Todd Peneaux
Respondent:
Federal Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roedder v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2022cv01014
Petitioner:
Richard Keith Roedder
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and Mark A. Vargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
