Cases 221 - 230 of 6,941
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HUNTER v. WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2022cv03864
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. CTF
as 1:2022cv03865
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
CTF, DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HEALTH SERVICES CTF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAKUBA v. D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent:
D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DONOGHUE v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
JAMES PATRICK DONOGHUE
Defendant:
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SHOVE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
THEODORE SHOVE
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. REINHARD
as 1:2022cv03846
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
REINHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMOS v. JACKSON
as 1:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOZO v. MAYORKAS
as 1:2022cv03857
Petitioner:
MAKUSHA GOZO
Respondent:
MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ASHFORD v. HELTON et al
as 1:2022cv03833
Plaintiff:
TONY ASHFORD
Defendant:
CATHELINE HELTON and SHARON CLARITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
