Cases 21 - 30 of 24,628
McCoy v. Dickson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCoy
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Eads, Chief Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Clem
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Cortney Perry
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Demorris Sanchez McKenzie
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2024cv02408
Plaintiff:
Terrance T. Collins
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Lt. Breeding, Sgt. Overholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Dickerson
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dean Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mock v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Brian Ray Mock
Respondent:
Warden James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Grady Perry, James Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Fast Access Correctional Health Care
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Wright
Defendant:
Fast Access Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Parton et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee
Defendant:
Chad Parton, Tammy Warren and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
