Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Renteria-Gaxiola v. USA
as 2:2012cv00804
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Santos Renteria-Gaxiola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santos-Silvas v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00171
Petitioner:
Raul Santos-Silvas
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maldonado v. USA
as 4:2012cv00034
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Santos Ebaristo Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santos-Ochoa v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00359
Petitioner:
Victor Santos-Ochoa
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santos v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
Jason K Santos
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Todd Thomas, Benjamin Griego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes-Gutierrez v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00178
Petitioner:
Santos Maximiliano Reyes-Gutierrez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reyes-Gutierrez v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00583
Petitioner:
Santos Maximiliano Reyes-Gutierrez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Torrefranca v. Suter et al
as 2:2009cv01525
Plaintiff:
Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant:
William K Suter, Erik A Fossum, Cathy A Catterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Romero v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv01143
Plaintiff:
Shalome Nicole Romero
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Del Santos and A.S.P.C.-Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00969
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Santos Lee
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. and John Does 1-45
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
