Cases 21 - 30 of 166
Michael Gorbey v. John Doe, et al
as 23-11850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a.k.a. Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, SIS, FNU VALISTERO, Psychology Supervisor, FNU MILLER, Case Manager Coordinator and others
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Duane A. Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, L. Grose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
John Doe, FNU Valistero, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Twitty v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Andre J Twitty
Defendant:
United States of America, Shannon D. Withers, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zimmerman v. Withers
as 23-60078
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jack Zimmerman
Respondent / Appellee:
Shannon D. Withers, Warden
Jones v. Withers
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Shannon Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Valle-Sanchez v. Withers
as 3:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Luis Del Valle-Sanchez
Defendant:
Shanon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Withers
as 2:2022cv00791
Petitioner:
Eugene Jackson
Respondent:
S. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mosley v. Withers
as 2:2022cv00790
Petitioner:
Ricardo Mosley
Respondent:
S. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
