Cases 21 - 30 of 208
Long v. D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN et al
as 0:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Long
Defendant:
D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN, Ramsey County Correctional Facility-Workhouse, A.P.S.-Advance Practice Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03589
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03568
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03227
Petitioner:
Howard Young
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03178
Petitioner:
Francisco Martinez
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stamps v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Alessandra Katie Stamps
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02866
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Torgerson v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02779
Petitioner:
Brady Daniel Torgerson
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Christopher J Gonzalez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02258
Petitioner:
Joseph Thompson
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
