Cases 21 - 30 of 220
White Eagle v. Michaelis et al
as 3:2022cv05410
Plaintiff:
Naomi Sue White Eagle
Defendant:
J Michaelis, Diedra Clay and B Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2022cv05380
Plaintiff:
Tyrice Aaron Hall
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Pierce County, B Blowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Strange et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Hicks, II
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, J Martin, A Wantanabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Uttecht et al
as 4:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Thompson, Mark Thomas and State of Washington
Defendant:
Jefferey Uttecht and Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Schenck et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Albert B Zuniga
Defendant:
Robert C Schenck, Bexar County Metropolitan Health District, University Health Science Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. King County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2022cv00048
Petitioner:
Albert B Zuniga
Respondent:
King County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nave v. Uttecht
as 2:2021cv00314
Petitioner:
Nathan B Nave
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Fernandez et al
as 2:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Sean Kyle Martin
Defendant:
H Fernandez, B Longino, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. Clark County
as 3:2021cv05633
Plaintiff:
Alexander Roy Sinclair
Defendant:
Clark County, Richard Bishop, Joe Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pond v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv05339
Defendant:
Jill Bottemiller, Terrance Doe, Cowlitz County Corrections Department and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Irwin Pond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
