Cases 21 - 30 of 266
Lee v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Herbert Eugene Lee, III
Defendant:
Richard Williams, Joshua Pickering, Nicholas Hollkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casamayor v. Warden of U.S.P. McCreary
as 6:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Daniel Casamayor
Defendant:
Warden of U.S.P. McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dupin v. Taylor
as 3:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Cory Paul Dupin
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Peyton v. Akers
as 0:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peyton
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Cameron et al
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Freida Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel Cameron and D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Aaron Daniels, Darrell Cox, Deputy Robert Gravett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Aaron Daniels, Jailer Darrell Cox, Deputy Robert Gravett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Eric C. Daniels
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. People of the State Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Daniels
Defendant:
People of the State Kentucky, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Crall et al
as 0:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
John Larry Daniels and David W. WIlliams
Defendant:
Doug Crall, Federic Kemen, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
