Cases 21 - 30 of 1,922
Gomez v. Will County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv16881
Plaintiff:
James E. Gomez
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Center, Mike Kelly, Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbin v. Warden
as 3:2023cv03867
Petitioner:
Ronald E Corbin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ervin v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv03926
Plaintiff:
James S. Ervin, Sr.
Defendant:
E. Williams, G. Zykan, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50425
Plaintiff:
Tracy E. Johnson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tarry Williams and Ramon Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saavedra-Moreno v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50423
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Saavedra-Moreno
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rosales-Wences v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50415
Petitioner:
Sergio Rosales-Wences
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Love v. Eddlemon et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
. Eddlemon, . Reese, . Barren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Eddlemon et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
. Eddlemon and Russell Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ray E. Hale
Defendant:
Mike Kelly and Will County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaya v. Russell et al
as 1:2023cv15445
Plaintiff:
Jesus E Anaya
Defendant:
Vaughn E Russell, K. Haynes, Niccoelle E. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
