Cases 21 - 30 of 480
Duarte v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2023cv11933
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
United States District Court, Clerk Manager, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Frane
as 1:2023cv11731
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Danielle Frane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Norfolk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv11725
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zapata v. Devris
as 4:2023cv40068
Petitioner:
Carlos Ramon Zapata
Respondent:
Matthew J. Devris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turrentine v. The Collier County Jail
as 1:2023cv11439
Petitioner:
Ivan J Turrentine
Respondent:
The Collier County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duarte v. Frane et al
as 1:2023cv11009
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Danielle Frane, Chris Dawly and Jimmy Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turrentine v. Naples Jail Center
as 1:2023cv11295
Petitioner:
Ivan J Turrentine
Respondent:
Naples Jail Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. Divris
as 4:2023cv10310
Petitioner:
Benzy Bain
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bain v. Divris
as 1:2023cv10310
Petitioner:
Benzy Bain
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
