Cases 21 - 30 of 154
Vogt v. MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC et al
as 0:2021cv01055
Defendant:
CO Robert Anderson, CO Ronald J. Imgrund, CO Raynor Blum and others
Plaintiff:
Molly Vogt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorgensen et al v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2020cv02349
Respondent:
B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal
Petitioner:
Dwight Jorgensen and Paxton Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Warden, Federal Prison Camp et al
as 0:2020cv01324
Petitioner:
Paxton Jeffrey Anderson
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Warden, Federal Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maddox III v. Sather et al
as 0:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Sara Johnson, John Grey, Ebenezer Tope Adebara and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Maddox III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Howard et al
as 0:2020cv00439
Plaintiff:
Terrence T. Williams
Defendant:
Madyson Erdelac, Durand Ackman, Dave Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Alcazar et al
as 0:2019cv03095
Defendant:
DHO Stolarzwk, C.O. Anderson, Ms Balas and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hageman v. Morrison County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2019cv03019
Defendant:
Caleb Ochoa, Antoinette Wetzel, Shawn Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hageman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billups et al v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2019cv02581
Defendant:
Officer. J. Elmore, Officer. Christopher Fodling, Officer. Matthew Kotaska and others
Plaintiff:
Adam R. Hageman and Khalil Billups
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Quam et al
as 0:2019cv00670
Defendant:
Bruce Anderson, Bruce Rieser, Duane Quam and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Henry Carter, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
