Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Bennett v. Sherrell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00992
Plaintiff: Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant: Ramon Sherrell, Andrew Brown, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Westbrooks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00686
Plaintiff: Ronnie Quentin Brown
Defendant: Bruce Westbrooks, Tony Parker, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd Brown, Jr. v. USA
as 16-2457
Petitioner - Appellant: FLOYD ANDREW BROWN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03113
Petitioner: ANDREW BROWN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00646
Movant: Troy Andrew Brown
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bennett v. McClure et al
as 3:2016cv01314
Plaintiff: Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant: Brandi McClure, David Bruce Westbrooks, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Fuller et al
as 3:2016cv01026
Plaintiff: Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant: Robert Fuller, David Bruce Westbrooks, Fred Schildkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv04903
Plaintiff: Andrew Brown
Defendant: Thomas Dart and Cook County Dep. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01624
Petitioner: RONALD ANDREW BROWN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROWN v. GARMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00872
Petitioner: ANDREW BROWN
Respondent: MARK GARMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?