Cases 21 - 30 of 200
Pipkin v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County Sheriff Department, Sgt. Mathew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day et al v. Knox County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Steven Day, LaShawn L. Johnson, Robert Atkins and others
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff Office, Tom Spangler, Daughtry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pabon et al
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Cody Smith
Defendant:
Jason Pabon, Eric Frailley and Adam Southern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sales v. Dillon et al
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Antwain Tapaige Sales
Defendant:
Lauren Dillon, Renee Blackwell, Tari Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Perry
as 1:2022cv01100
Petitioner:
Montez Adams
Defendant:
Warden Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Lewis et al
as 1:2022mc00012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Randall Lewis, Luke Burns, Alan Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosenblum v. Franklin County Jail
as 1:2021cv00280
Petitioner:
Adam Stuart Rosenblum
Respondent:
Franklin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel et al v. Neff et al
as 2:2021cv02511
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D: Daniel and Wenona Calloway Daniel
Defendant:
Steven S: Neff, Christopher D: Poole, Deanora J: Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
