Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Burnett v. Danville Adult Detention Center
as 7:2021cv00183
Defendant:
Danville Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Nothwestern Regional Adult Detention Center Jail et al
as 7:2021cv00140
Defendant:
Nothwestern Regional Adult Detention Center Jail, Clay Corbin and James Whittley
Plaintiff:
Clinton S. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Amherst County Adult Detention Center
as 7:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Landon Ryan McCormick
Defendant:
Amherst County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Adult Detention Center
as 7:2021cv00070
Defendant:
Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Vernice Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Amherst County Adult Detention Center
as 7:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
Justin McClintic Craig
Defendant:
Amherst County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Adult Detention Center
as 7:2020cv00757
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brooks Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Lynchburg Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Timothy E. Trent and Lynchburg Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbs v. Lynchburg Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Lynchburg Adult Detention Center and Timothy E. Trent
Plaintiff:
Joseph McClain Cobbs and Michael Thomas Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterry v. Mardavich et al
as 7:2019cv00851
Defendant:
Frank E. Mardavich, Paul Totten, Danville Adult Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Ray Sterry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Danville Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2019cv00848
Plaintiff:
Mins Shaqueile Wilkerson
Defendant:
City of Danville and Danville Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
