Cases 21 - 30 of 185
Anderson v. St Joseph County et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Estate Plaintiff:
Brittany Anderson
Defendant:
St Joseph County, Sheriff William Redman, Warden Julienne Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONSIVAIS et al v. NIDYE et al
as 1:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV and JOHNATHAN DONTAI' VE FOREST
Defendant:
NIDYE and ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
QUAYLAN K'WON ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
EMERSON, POWELL, ANDERSON, JAMES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
JERRY EMERSON, DAMON POWELL, CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02177
Petitioner:
KAYCEE ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Batsel et al
as 3:2022cv01014
Plaintiff:
Julius Anderson
Defendant:
Scott Batsel and J Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01994
Petitioner:
DARRYL ANDERSON
Respondent:
SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Huntsman et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Peter R Huntsman and Hub Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON, JR. v. RICHEY
as 1:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
KEITH ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
ALISHA RICHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. MONNETT et al
as 2:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
QUAYLAN K'WON ANDERSON
Defendant:
MONNETT, ARNETT and FBOP TERRE HAUTE, IN USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
