Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Al-Maqablh v. Temple et al
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Bobby Temple, John Carter, Attorney General Andy Beshear and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Al-Maqablh
Respondent:
John Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Sanderson v. Healey et al
as 3:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Sanderson
Defendant:
Steven Healey, Mike Anderson, Steve Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Litteral et al
as 6:2017cv00197
Petitioner:
Roger Dean Hall
Respondent:
Kathy Litteral, Andy Beshear and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stoup v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Stoup and Clifford Stoup
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Andy Breshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torian v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Frank Torian, Jr.
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Attorney General Andy Beshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Cedric W. O'Neal
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Attorney General Andy Breshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepherd v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Michael Shepherd
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Attorney General Andy Breshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jason Brooks
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Andy Beshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Warden Aaron Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00114
Petitioner:
Frederick Lee Davis
Respondent:
Warden Aaron Smith and Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
