Cases 21 - 30 of 69
ARMSTRONG v. SUESSER et al
as 1:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
SUESSER, DELANEY and BARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. DIRAIMO et al
as 1:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
DIRAIMO, ROTH and ABRAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIEHL-ARMSTRONG et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00224
Petitioner:
MARJORIE DIEHL-ARMSTRONG and MARK MARVIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KAMMERDEINER v. CLARK et al
as 2:2017cv00808
Petitioner:
KEITH L. KAMMERDEINER
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIBSON v. FLEMMING et al
as 2:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GIBSON
Defendant:
MARY FLEMMING, JOHN DOE FLEMMING, JOHN DOE ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STORY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01241
Plaintiff:
STANTON STORY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, KERRI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. USA
as 1:2015cv01520
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Bernard Armstrong, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Living Soul Chief Asan Manuel Mustafah Fearce W. Yazoo v. Federal Court Defendants et al
as 1:2015cv00446
Petitioner:
Living Soul Chief Asan Manuel Mustafah Fearce W. Yazoo
Respondent:
Federal Court Defendants, State of Pennsylvania Defendants, Philadelphia Municipal Court Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHRISTIAN v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 2:2014cv02805
Plaintiff:
GASTIN P. CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM ARMSTRONG, MONTCO COUNTY HAS VIOLATED MY DUE PROCESS RIGHTS and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TARSELLI v. HARKLAND et al
as 2:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
TODD (HYUNG-RAE) TARSELLI
Defendant:
HARKLAND , J. M. SMITH , HAYWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
