Cases 21 - 30 of 129
Mangus v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Mangus
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, Joseph Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Ely et al
as 7:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Defendant:
J. Ely, Mr. Long, Melanie Salyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Tillman et al
as 3:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Christian Alexander Neal
Defendant:
Officer M. Tillman, Nurse Bailey, Nurse Regan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farabee v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Brian Damon Farabee
Defendant:
Nelson Smith, Angela N. Torres, Angela Harvell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smarr v. Armor et al
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Smarr
Defendant:
Armor, Harold Clarke, Mack Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farabee v. The County of Dinwiddie Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Farabee
Defendant:
The County of Dinwiddie Virginia, Sheriff of Dinwiddie Virginia, Linda M.H. Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Preston Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Ofc. Thompson, Ofc(s) of A&B Day & Night Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey Harris v. (PWC) ADC
as 1:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
Joshua Angelo Bailey Harris
Defendant:
(PWC) ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bailey et al
as 1:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
Colton Jay Johnson
Defendant:
Mack Bailey, R. Woodson, C Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
