Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Gumpal v. Queen of the Valley Medical Center et al
as 3:2017cv05597
Plaintiff:
Mauro Gumpal
Defendant:
Queen of the Valley Medical Center, St. Joseph Health System, Ali S. Vaziri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Foreman et al
as 2:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Averille Leon Willis
Defendant:
Norkesha Foreman, Jon Weddle, Gregg Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gumpal v. Queen of the Valley Medical Center et al
as 4:2016cv06611
Plaintiff:
Mauro Gumpal
Defendant:
Queen of the Valley Medical Center, St. Joseph Health System, Ali S. Vaziri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slape v. Haase et al
as 5:2016cv05408
Petitioner:
Darrell Slape
Respondent:
Bobby Haase, Denise Milano, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mrozek v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv01308
Plaintiff:
Brad Mrozek
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Amaya, Espinosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mrozek v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016at00253
Plaintiff:
Brad Mrozek
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mrozek v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Brad Mrozek
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thao v. California Prison Industry Authority et al
as 3:2016cv01098
Plaintiff:
Nou Thao
Defendant:
California Prison Industry Authority, Joe Dobie, Gary Loredo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lopez et al
as 2:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Clark Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Lopez, A Stone, A. Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Frauenheim
as 2:2015cv01365
Petitioner:
Brad Robert Miller
Respondent:
Scott Frauenheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
