Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Ruffin v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Norman Ruffin
Defendant:
(First Name Unknown) Medical Doctor Calhoun, (First Name Unknown) Medical Doctor Clements, (First Name Unknown) Medical Doctor Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Norman Ruffin
Defendant:
(First Name Unknown) Calhoun, (First Name Unknown) Clements, (First Name Unknown) Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. Schlank et al
as 3:2015cv00761
Plaintiff:
Terence Clements
Defendant:
Anita Schlank, Andre Belsches, Marina Tikhonova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. Clarke
as 1:2013cv00630
Petitioner:
John Allan Clements
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clements v. Clarke
as 1:2011cv00952
Petitioner:
John Allan Clements
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. Brooks et al
as 1:2010cv01462
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Urian Griffin
Defendant:
Brooks, House, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanton v. Culpeper County et al
as 7:2010cv00547
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Blanton
Defendant:
Richard Brooking, Sara Clements, Culpeper County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Wellons et al
as 3:2009cv00587
Plaintiff:
Randall Inman, Sr.
Defendant:
William L. Wellons, Robert E. Clement and Michael Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Landry et al
as 3:2009cv00588
Plaintiff:
Randall Inman, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael Landry and Robert E. Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kissi v. Clement et al
as 1:2008cv01135
Petitioner:
David Kissi
Respondent:
Paul Clement, Harley Lappin, D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
