Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Gonzalez-Rivera
as 3:2018cv01945
Petitioner:
Carlos L. Gonzalez-Rivera
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Wanda Vazquez-Garced and Lorraine Martinez-Adorno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2018cv01944
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Maria Lugardo-Cintron
Plaintiff:
Manuel Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos-Rodriguez v. Santos et al
as 3:2018cv01946
Respondent:
Pedro Santos and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Petitioner:
Luis G. Burgos-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Camacho-Ramos v. Albelo-Cartagena et al
as 3:2018cv01643
Petitioner:
Jose L. Camacho-Ramos
Respondent:
Clovis Albelo-Cartagena and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baez-Laureano
as 3:2018cv01332
Petitioner:
Angel Baez-Laureano
Receiver:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valle-Rosario v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 3:2018cv01190
Petitioner:
Wendell Valle-Rosario
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cubano-Escoriaza v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2018cv01086
Petitioner:
Jose A Cubano-Escoriaza
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Carlos Rosado-Torrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cortes-Lopez v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2018cv01062
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Cortes-Lopez
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and Ramon Colon-Collazo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena-Luguera v. Rolon et al
as 3:2017cv02300
Plaintiff:
Juan C Pena-Luguera
Defendant:
Erick Rolon, Vicente Figueroa, Denisse Z. Santiago-Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina-Nadal v Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2017cv02228
Petitioner:
Hector Luis Molina-Nadal
Defendant:
Jose Diversa-Ayala, Wanda Vazquez-Garced, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
