Cases 21 - 30 of 371
Carter v. Barrs
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Brian Barrs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Effingham County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Effingham County Sheriff's Department, Winston Mock, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcano v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2022cv04989
Plaintiff:
Keon Marcano
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, DeKalb County, Ms. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwin v. Carter
as 3:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Ricardo Keith Edwin
Respondent:
Sidney Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Morris et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Terrell Walker
Defendant:
FNU Morris, FNU Griffin, J. Millier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Carter
as 1:2022cv03397
Petitioner:
Ogbebor Owen
Respondent:
Acting Warden Sidney Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
DESMOND CARTER
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER, WILLIE LOCKETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
WILLIAMS v. KILBY et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
TAYMAR FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD KILBY, WARDEN OF SECURITY MCCLUNG, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
