Cases 21 - 30 of 1,055
Monderen v. Price et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kavin D. Price and Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Christopher Neace, Luke James Stobie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rector v. Strid
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Kody D Rector
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. McGee
Defendant:
Donna Anderson and Felix Vincentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios-Rosa v. Department of Health et al
as 4:2023cv01710
Plaintiff:
Angel D. Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Department of Health and Department of Corrections of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. USA
as 1:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Ervin D. Boyce
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Donovan v. Heartland Regional Medical Center d/b/a Mosaic Life Care et al
as 5:2023cv06127
Plaintiff:
Devin Donovan
Defendant:
Heartland Regional Medical Center d/b/a Mosaic Life Care, Rachel Dunston, Matthew Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 1:2023cv00173
Petitioner:
Shedric D. Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bronson v Chariton County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Travis Bronson
Defendant:
Chariton County Sheriff's Office and Scanning Program - Fulton R&D Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
