Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01190
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01118
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. David Blumberg
as 11-7600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID R. BLUMBERG, Chairman and RUTH OGLE, Project Manager
Young-Bey v. Blumberg et al
as 1:2010cv02448
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
David R. Blumberg and Ruth Ann Ogle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2010cv01520
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Wendell M. France, Maryland Parole Commissions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Blumberg et al
as 8:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
David R. Blumberg, Nancy Murphy, M. M. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00026
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frederick Goodman v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 09-8164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK L. GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, DAVID R. BLUMBERG, Chairman, MICHAEL BLOUNT, Commissioner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00245
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodman v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 1:2008cv01337
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Goodman
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission, David R. Blumberg, Michael Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
