Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 112
DEAN v. LT. NAPOLEAN et al
as 2:2021cv00971
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: LT. NAPOLEAN, SGT. ZHAURUNG, C/O KARPENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00968
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: AL STEVEN BUZAS, KAREN SOKOL, JOSEPH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. KUZMA et al
as 2:2021cv00972
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: CO KUZMA, CO ANKROM and CO DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. ADAMSON et al
as 2:2021cv00966
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER R. ADAMSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KUZMA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ANKROM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. ODEM
as 2:2021cv00973
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: JUDGE MARY ANN ODEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00967
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and COMMONWEALTH STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. ADAMSON et al
as 2:2021cv00970
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: C.O. ADAMSON, C.O. KUZMA and C.O. MILLIKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. NAPOLEAN et al
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: LT NAPOLEAN, SGT ZHAURUNG, C/O EDDIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEANS v. CLARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00459
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner: DARRIAN DEANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Lappin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant: Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff: Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?