Cases 21 - 30 of 448
Brown v. Fowler et al
as 7:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Aaron Brown
Defendant:
Dean Fowler, Lauren Parish, Lyle Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan III v. Nguyen et al
as 4:2022cv04176
Plaintiff:
Milton Callahan III
Defendant:
Lynn Nguyen, Christopher Dean Morton and Neal Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01185
Petitioner:
Dean Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden FNU Delap, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01195
Petitioner:
Dean Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden FNU Delap, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Williams et al
as 6:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Edward Dewayne Hawkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Williams, Officer FNU Avilas, Officer FNU Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 4:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wade Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean, Wanda Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 4:2022cv00780
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark J Lieberman
Petitioner:
Terry Dean Anderson, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 3:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean and Wanda Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Jones
Defendant:
State of Texas, Kenneth B. Florence, Brian Jagneaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. USA
as 2:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Joseph Dean Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
