Cases 21 - 30 of 32
MILLER v. SWEENY et al
as 2:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MILLER
Defendant:
CINDY SWEENY, PAUL LAGANA, JAMES NWAOGWUGWU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROHS v. FRATALONE, ET AL
as 2:2013cv07870
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GROHS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, ANGEL L. SANTIAGO, ROBERT BUECHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. HASKINS et al
as 2:2013cv05501
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS THOMAS
Defendant:
L. HASKINS, DEBORAH MALONEY, HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMART v. OASIN et al
as 1:2013cv04339
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
ALEXANDRA B. OASIN, ALEXANDRO URBINA, DEBORAH ECHELBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. HAUCK et al
as 1:2010cv02445
Petitioner:
DEBORAH PHILLIPS
Respondent:
WILLIAM HAUCK and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUMAS v. FERRER et al
as 3:2009cv05871
Plaintiff:
JEROME DUMAS
Defendant:
CARLOS FERRER, JAMES RAULTH, MALAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICKS v. BYRNES et al
as 1:2009cv00473
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN RICKS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH BYRNES, SUSAN KIEFFER, JOHN FEHLNER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DUMAS v. CONWAY et al
as 3:2008cv04432
Plaintiff:
JEROME DUMAS
Defendant:
JOHN CONWAY, PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, GEORGE M. BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BECKER v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2007cv05421
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
HUDSON, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT A. FIATAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NASH v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR PAULA T. DOW et al
as 2:2007cv05163
Plaintiff:
ASKIA J. NASH
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR PAULA T. DOW, JOHN LOVE, DAWN SIMONETTI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
