Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03336
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hung Dong v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55716
Petitioner - Appellant: HUNG XUAN DONG
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Long v. Wright We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00050
Petitioner: Dong Yu Long
Respondent: Nicole D. Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas Clay v. Eldon Monk, et al
as 17-20306
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS H. CLAY
Defendant - Appellee: PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT ELDON L. MONK, DIRECTOR EARNESTINE B. JULYE, N.C. MARCO HENKERMEYER and others
Clay v. Monk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00748
Plaintiff: Thomas H Clay
Defendant: Eldon L Monk, Earnestine B Julye, Marco Henkermeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Raissi et al
as 1:2017cv00676
Defendant: Raissi, David Raissi, Brian Kemp and others
Plaintiff: Vickers and Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Vickers v. Craig Dong, et al
as 16-17630
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY SCOTT VICKERS
Defendant - Appellee: CRAIG E. DONG, CC 0215 Badge, WEST COBB DINER, PUBLIX and others
: PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05828
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Corley v. Farrell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03367
Defendant: Mary Adamo, Paul Albano, John Capra and others
Plaintiff: Royce Corley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant: Craig E. Dong, West Cobb Diner, Publix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?