Cases 21 - 30 of 234
Mondric Bradley v. Pelicia Hall, Commissioner
as 18-60303
Petitioner - Appellant:
MONDRIC BRADLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
EARNEST LEE, Warden
Derrick Sumrall v. Marshall Fisher, et al
as 18-60311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK SUMRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL FISHER, MARCUS DAVIS, DEMTRE RAY and others
Carroll v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Carroll
Defendant:
"Unknown" Rogers, Unknown Muffett, Unknown Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LaVan Yankton, Sr. v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 18-60240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVAN YANKTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, EARNEST LEE and others
Levonzel Anderson v. Norris Morris, et al
as 17-60754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVONZEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NORRIS MORRIS, Sued in His Official and Individual Capacity, STEVEN PICKETT, Sued in His Official and Individual Capacity, CLARNCE BROWN, Sued in His Official and Individual Capacity and others
Carroll v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Carroll
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Moffett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Gibbs, Jr. v. Earnest Lee, et al
as 17-60684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY GIBBS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT EARNEST LEE, WILLIE KNIGHTEN, Health Care Administrator and COUNTY OF SUNFLOWER, as a person
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 4:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barabour, Tamara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 1:2017cv07140
Plaintiff:
Soloman S Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barabour, Tamara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Henry et al
as 4:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Demarco Wilkins
Defendant:
Unknown Henry, Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
