Cases 21 - 30 of 67
May v. McGinley et al
as 3:2016cv00346
Petitioner:
Freeman William May
Respondent:
Tom McGinley and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAY v. TYWALK et al
as 2:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN WILLIAM MAY
Defendant:
JOHN C. TYWALK, DAVID ARNOLD, JR., STEWART LEV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEARY v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2015cv06524
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FREEMAN MCLEARY
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA INC. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joh v. Suhey, D.O. et al
as 1:2015cv02286
Plaintiff:
Richard Joh
Defendant:
Paul Suhey, D.O., William Young, Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLICK v. HEFFNER et al
as 5:2015cv05423
Plaintiff:
DARELL D'ANGELO COLLICK
Defendant:
NICOLE HEFFNER , CAROL SOMMERS , KAUREN FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv01946
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN MCFADDEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Norwood et al
as 1:2015cv00666
Petitioner:
Rocky L. Freeman
Respondent:
J. L. Norwood , S. Spaulding , J. Lincalis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COVERT v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
JOHN COVERT
Defendant:
FREEMAN, BYERS, CROSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAY v. TYLWALK et al
as 2:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN W. MAY
Defendant:
JOHN C. TYLWALK, ROBERT J. EBY, BRADFORD H. CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2014cv05139
Petitioner:
TRACEY FREEMAN
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
